An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

Blog Article

In case the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only accomplished If your employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence along with the petitioner company responded for the allegations as such they were very well aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by law." It is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Since the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be reached, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Ordinarily, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (which include People in obvious violation of recognized case legislation) for the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, as well as the case is not really appealed, the decision will stand.

As a result, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner should pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these kinds of an appeal hasn't however been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may perhaps then seek out further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more

However it is made clear that police is free to take action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities topic to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused towards the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also be certain respect of your family get rid of in accordance with legislation and should they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they're able to act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall safe concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security on the house is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Thinking about the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has actually been achieved. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated earlier mentioned. Read more

All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in help on the Supreme Court, making certain the enforcement of its judgments. Because the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is achieved, the decision in the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. Read more

Several judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in inserting the Petitioner's name over the ECL based to the criminal case are inconsistent with set up legal principles. For that reason, this petition must be allowed Read more

Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common regulation, is usually a regulation that is based on precedents, that is definitely the judicial decisions from previous cases, instead than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or website similar tribunals.

Are you currently looking for Court Information? You should utilize our site to search for the case or search for a person. Information to the site is updated every 24 several hours at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found on the search site is provided to be used as reference material and is not the official court record.

182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does supply for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set via the government.

The different roles of case law in civil and common law traditions create differences in the way in which that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale guiding their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the wider legal principles.

Preceding 4 tax years interpreted. It's not at all from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may well search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more